I worked as a Samaritan for a number of years and found it both
a rewarding and challenging experience.
As well as being in the privileged position of being trusted to hear
people’s most intimate thoughts and feelings, I learned many things, about
myself as well as skills that I have used in my career as a Knowledge
Management (KM) consultant.
On a bike ride this morning, I thought about the relationship
between KM and the work of Samaritans and I think many of us working in
Knowledge Management have much to learn from this particular line of work.
Judge not, lest ye be
judged
Samaritans do not judge those that get in touch, seeking
their help. Samaritans may hear things
of which they disapprove, be they attitudes, opinions or things that people have
done that have harmed others, perhaps in unbelievably cruel ways. But there is never any judgement from the
person taking the call.
In KM also, objectivity is vital. KM people and teams should remain impartial
as they learn (and facilitate wider learning) what has worked and not worked in
their organisation. Whilst the KM team
has to appear somewhere on the org chart, they should be beholden to no-one
whilst helping everyone equally.
Listen, then listen
again
Listening is at the heart of the work that Samaritans
do. They create and provide a supportive
environment in which callers or visitors can open up and express thoughts and
feelings that they may not yet have actually heard out loud. Samaritans know that sometimes silence is the
most effective way of getting someone to speak – few of us will resist the urge
to fill that vacuum. Also, the way
things are said is sometimes more important than what is being said. Listening – really listening – can help Samaritans
pick up on tone, mood and emotion.
In KM, listening is essential. Creating an atmosphere that enables people to
express ideas, concerns and suggestions alike is an important element of a KM framework, through and around which knowledge can flow. When running lessons capture meetings or
knowledge retention interviews, listening – really listening – tells you far
more than just ‘what was said’ and can inform where the discussion goes next.
Who you are doesn’t
matter; what you say does
When they contact Samaritans, people can give their name if
they want, or another, or none at all. Anonymity
helps people open up, as does the knowledge that what they say will be treated
in confidence and will not be shared with anyone outside Samaritans. It’s easier to share things that might be
embarrassing or shameful with someone that we don’t know and will never know.
Anonymity and confidentiality have their place in KM also
but must be used carefully. A key part
of knowledge management is the enabling the connection between people that need
knowledge with those that have it – hard to achieve at the best of times…even
harder if people remain anonymous.
Nevertheless, diagnostic tools such as KM assessments and surveys are a
good way of getting under the skin of an organisation and people are more
forthcoming if they know they can speak freely.
Similarly, lessons capture meetings may be recorded to help
transcription of the discussion but the recordings are discarded once the
lessons are typed up.
Sharing is a good in
itself
We can never know for sure but there is a strong argument to
be made that suicide sometimes occurs not as the result of bad feelings (i.e.
shame, guilt, depression, grief, worry etc.) but because of the apparent
inability to express or handle those feelings.
It is the ability of Samaritans to get people to share these feelings
that helps them and can reduce the temptation of suicide.
At its heart, knowledge management is all about
sharing. KM people see the sharing of
knowledge as a good in its own right and work to facilitate this, through: the
recruitment, training and retention of the right people; the development of
supportive processes; the procurement of useful technology and the creation of
a governance structure and culture that encourages sharing and discourages
hoarding.
The harder you push,
the greater the resistance
One of the central tenets of Samaritans’ work is the
recognition that everyone has a right to make their own decisions, including
whether to take their own life. In
practice, this means that all callers are asked if they are feeling suicidal
and, if they are, the call proceeds in a sympathetic but straightforward manner. This may seem counter-intuitive but one of
the things that makes Samaritans different from friends, family, colleagues and
others is that they will not try to talk people out of suicide. Samaritans don’t want people to take their
own lives, any more than anyone else would.
But they know that attempts to ‘talk people round’ usually fail, they
create resistance and they indicate to the caller that even Samaritans just don’t
get it.KM practitioners benefit from an awareness of the way feedback loops work (i.e. part of ‘systems thinking’). This approach acknowledges potential resistance to initiatives and works to develop ways of reducing it – as opposed to ‘pushing even harder’. Such efforts will almost always fail, or will leave all parties bruised and battered. Asking people about their concerns and fears can reduce them.
For a conversation about KM with one of the world's leading firms of Knowledge Management consultants, please get in touch direct or via the Knoco website.
No comments:
Post a Comment